fix(BRIDGE-138): remove deprecated doc.

This commit is contained in:
Xavier Michelon
2024-08-27 08:49:15 +02:00
parent e290cd308b
commit 1ea06a95b7
6 changed files with 0 additions and 400 deletions

View File

@ -1,135 +0,0 @@
# Bridge
## Main blocks
This is basic overview of the main bridge blocks.
Note connection between IMAP/SMTP and PMAPI. IMAP and SMTP packages are in the queue to be refactored
and we would like to try to have functionality in bridge core or bridge utilities (such as messages)
than direct usage of PMAPI from IMAP or SMTP. Also database (BoltDB) should be moved to bridge core.
```mermaid
graph LR
S[Server]
C[Client]
U[User]
subgraph "Bridge app"
Core[Bridge core]
API[PMAPI]
Store
DB[BoltDB]
Frontend["Qt / CLI"]
IMAP
SMTP
IMAP --> Store
IMAP --> Core
SMTP --> Core
SMTP --> API
Core --> API
Core --> Store
Store --> API
Store --> DB
Frontend --> Core
end
C --> IMAP
C --> SMTP
U --> Frontend
API --> S
```
## Code structure
More detailed graph of main types used in Bridge app and connection between them. Here is already
communication to PMAPI only from bridge core which is not true, yet. IMAP and SMTP are still calling
PMAPI directly.
```mermaid
graph TD
C["Client (e.g. Thunderbird)"]
PM[Proton Mail Server]
subgraph "Bridge app"
subgraph "Bridge core"
B[Bridge]
U[User]
B --> U
end
subgraph Store
StoreU[Store User]
StoreA[Address]
StoreM[Mailbox]
StoreU --> StoreA
StoreA --> StoreM
end
subgraph Credentials
CredStore[Store]
Creds[Credentials]
CredStore --> Creds
end
subgraph Frontend
CLI
Qt
end
subgraph IMAP
IB[IMAP backend]
IA[IMAP address]
IM[IMAP mailbox]
IB --> B
IB --> IA
IA --> IM
IA --> U
IA --> StoreA
IM --> StoreM
end
subgraph SMTP
SB[SMTP backend]
SS[SMTP session]
SB --> B
SB --> SS
SS --> U
end
end
subgraph PMAPI
AC[Client]
end
C --> IB
C --> SB
CLI --> B
Qt --> B
U --> CredStore
U --> Creds
U --> StoreU
StoreU --> AC
StoreA --> AC
StoreM --> AC
B --> AC
U --> AC
AC --> PM
```
## How to debug
Run `make run-debug` which starts [Delve](https://github.com/go-delve/delve).

View File

@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
# Communication
## First login and sync
When user logs in to the bridge for the first time, immediately starts the first sync.
First sync downloads all headers of all e-mails and creates database to have proper UIDs
and indexes for IMAP. See [database](database.md) for more information.
By default, whenever it's possible, sync downloads only all e-mails maiblox which already
have list of labels so we can construct all mailboxes (inbox, sent, trash, custom folders
and labels) without need to download each e-mail headers many times.
Note that we need to download also bodies to calculate size of the e-mail and set proper
content type (clients uses content type for guess if e-mail contains attachment)--but only
body, not attachment. Also it's downloaded only for the first time. After that we store
those information in our database so next time we only sync headers, labels and so on.
First sync takes some time. List of 150 messages takes about second and then we need to
download bodies for each message. We still need to do some optimalizations. Anyway, if
user has reasonable amount of e-mails, there is good chance user will see e-mails in the
client right after adding account.
When account is added to client, client start the sync. This sync will ask Bridge app
for all headers (done quickly) and then starts to download all bodies and attachment.
Unfortunately for some e-mail more than once if the same e-mail is in more mailboxes
(e.g. inbox and all mail)--there is no way to tell over IMAP it's the same message.
After successful login of client to IMAP, Bridge starts event loop. That periodicly ask
servers (each 30 seconds) for new updates (new message, keys, …).
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant S as Server
participant B as Bridge
participant C as Client
Note right of B: Set up PM account<br/>by user
loop First sync
B ->> S: Fetch body and attachments
Note right of B: Build local database<br/>(e-mail UIDs)
end
Note right of C: Set up IMAP/SMTP<br/>by user
C ->> B: IMAP login
B ->> S: Authenticate user
Note right of B: Create IMAP user
loop Event loop, every 30 sec
B ->> S: Fetch e-mail headers
B ->> C: Send IMAP IDLE response
end
C ->> B: IMAP LIST directories
loop Client sync
C ->> B: IMAP SELECT directory
C ->> B: IMAP SEARCH e-mails UIDs
C ->> B: IMAP FETCH of e-mail UID
B ->> S: Fetch body and attachments
Note right of B: Decrypt message<br/>and attachment
B ->> C: IMAP response
end
```
## IMAP IDLE extension
IMAP IDLE is extension, it has to be supported by both client and server. IMAP server (in our case
the bridge) supports it so clients can use it. It works by issuing `IDLE` command by the client and
keeps the connection open. When the server has some update, server (the bridge) will respond to that
by `EXISTS` (new message), `APPEND` (imported message), `EXPUNGE` (deleted message) or `MOVE` response.
Even when there is connection with IDLE open, server can mark the client as inactive. Therefore,
it's recommended the client should reissue the connection after each 29 minutes. This is not the
real push and can fail!
Our event loop is also simple pull and it will trigger IMAP IDLE when we get some new update from
the server. Would be good to have push from the server, but we need to wait for the support on API.
RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2177
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant S as Server
participant B as Bridge
participant C as Client
C ->> B: IMAP IDLE
loop Every 30 seconds
S ->> B: Checking events
B ->> C: IMAP response
end
```
## Sending e-mails
E-mail are sent over standard SMTP protocol. Our bridge takes the message, encrypts and sent it
further to our server which will then send the message to its final destination. The important
and tricky part is encryption. See [encryption](encryption.md) or [PMEL document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lEBkG0DC5FOWlumInKtu4a9Cc1Eszp48ZhFy9UpPQso/edit)
for more information.
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant S as Server
participant B as Bridge
participant C as Client
C ->> B: SMTP send e-mail
Note right of B: Encrypt messages
B ->> S: Send encrypted e-mail
B ->> C: Respond OK
```

View File

@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
# Database
Bridge needs to have a small database to pair our IDs with IMAP UIDs and indexes. IMAP protocol
requires every message to have an unique UID in mailbox. In this context, mailbox is not an account,
but a folder or label. This means that one message can have more UIDs, one for each mailbox (folder),
and that two messages can have the same UID, but each for different mailbox (folder).
IMAP index is just an index. Look at it like to an array: `["UID1", "UID2", "UID3"]`. We can access
message by UID or index; for example index 2 and UID `UID2`. When this message is deleted, we need
to re-index all following messages. The array will look now like `["UID1", "UID3"]` and the last
message can be accessed by index 2 or UID `UID3`.
See RFCs for more information:
* https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc822
* https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501
Our database is currently built on BBolt and have those buckets (key-value storage):
* Message metadata bucket:
* `[metadataBucket][API_ID] -> pmapi.Message{subject, from, to, size, other headers...}` (without body or attachment)
* Mapping buckets
* `[mailboxesBucket][addressID-mailboxID][api_ids][API_ID] -> UID`
* `[mailboxesBucket][addressID-mailboxID][imap_ids][UID] -> API_ID`

View File

@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
# Encryption
Encryption is done in PMAPI, bridge utils and bridge itself. The best would be to keep encryption
in PMAPI and bridge utils (in package such as messages). All packages are using our high-level
GopenPGP library on top of OpenPGP.
## `gopenpgp.KeyRing`
We use one `KeyRing` per address. Our usage then contains all keys for specific address. Primary
key is always on the first position, then there old ones to be able to decrypt last e-mail.
OpenPGP encrypts given message with all available keys, so we need to first get first (primary)
key for encryption to have message encrypted only once with primary key.

View File

@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
# Bridge Documentation
Documentation pages in order to read for a novice:
* [Bridge code](bridge.md)
* [Internal Bridge database](database.md)
* [Communication between Bridge, Client and Server](communication.md)
* [Encryption](encryption.md)

View File

@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
# Update mechanism of Bridge
There are multiple options how to change version of application:
* Automatic in-app update
* Manual in-app update
* Manual install
In-app update ends with restarting bridge into new version. Automatic in-app
update is downloading, verifying and installing the new version immediately
without user confirmation. For manual in-app update user needs to confirm first.
Update is done from special update file published on website.
The manual installation requires user to download, verify and install manually
using installer for given OS.
The bridge is installed and executed differently for given OS:
* Windows and Linux apps are using launcher mechanism:
* There is system protected installation path which is created on first
install. It contains bridge exe and launcher exe. When users starts
bridge the launcher is executed first. It will check update path compare
version with installed one. The newer version then is then executed.
* Update mechanism means to replace files in update folder which is located
in user space.
* macOS app does not use launcher
* No launcher, only one executable
* In-App update replaces the bridge files in installation path directly
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph Frontend
U[User requests<br>version check]
ManIns((Notify user about<br>manual install<br>is needed))
R((Notify user<br>about restart))
ManUp((Notify user about<br>manual update))
NF((Notify user about<br>force update))
ManUp -->|Install| InstFront[Install]
InstFront -->|Ok| R
InstFront -->|Error| ManIns
U --> CheckFront[Check online]
CheckFront -->|Ok| IAFront{Is new version<br>and applicable?}
CheckFront -->|Error| ManIns
IAFront -->|No| Latest((Notify user<br>has latest version))
IAFront -->|Yes| CanInstall{Can update?}
CanInstall -->|No| ManIns
CanInstall -->|Yes| NotifOrInstall{Is automatic<br>update enabled?}
NotifOrInstall -->|Manual| ManUp
end
subgraph Backend
W[Wait for next check]
W --> Check[Check online]
Check --> NV{Has new<br>version?}
Check -->|Error| W
NV -->|No new version| W
IA{Is install<br>applicable?}
NV -->|New version<br>available| IA
IA -->|Local rollout<br>not enough| W
IA -->|Yes| AU{Is automatic\nupdate enabled?}
AU -->|Yes| CanUp{Can update?}
CanUp -->|No| ManIns
CanUp -->|Yes| Ins[Install]
Ins -->|Error| ManIns
Ins -->|Ok| R
AU -->|No| ManUp
ManUp -->|Ignore| W
F[Force update]
F --> NF
end
ManIns --> Web[Open web page]
NF --> Web
ManUp --> Web
R --> Re[Restart]
NF --> Q[Quit bridge]
NotifOrInstall -->|Automatic| W
```
The non-trivial is to combine the update with setting change:
* turn off/on automatic in-app updates
* change from stable to beta or back
_TODO fill flow chart details_
We are not support downgrade functionality. Only some circumstances can lead to
downgrading the app version.
_TODO fill flow chart details_